Ancient Roman Capitalis Monumentalis lettering and its modification and adaptation by the coin engravers of the Roman Empire (with photographic examples of early, later and Tetrarchic coin lettering). I frequently post notes and addenda on this integral Message Board. Visitor posts, including questions, are most welcome.
Capitalis Monumentalis
The inscriptional letterforms found on Roman
coins are based on those of CAPITALIS MONUMENTALIS employed by
stone cutters for edifices, monuments, tombstones, etc.
A particularly fine extant example is found on Trajan's
column in Rome and the essential constructs of these
letterforms are the models for all Majuscule (Capital)
alphabets used in the western world. Stonecutters in
particular still employ their distinctive proportions
and terminating serifs. It should be noted that only
twenty letters were used in the ancient Roman alphabet
: A B C D E F G H I L M N O P Q R
S T V X. Our modern J and U
were not used, their equivalents being I and V
respectively. Thus, our modern JULIUS was written IVLIVS. The letter K was seldom used and then only before
A. The letters
Y and Z were only used when reproducing
Greek words. W was not
part of the ancient Roman alphabet at all. It was
Medieval scribes who eventually formalized the
construction models for the letters J K U W Y Z. Capitalis Monumentalis
lettering is at the apex of the "Hierarchy of Scripts"
for Calligraphers and is often used by them for
especially important headers in pen and ink renditions.
There are numerous excellent photographs of actual CAPITALIS MONUMENTALIS lettering (including that on Trajan's column) mostly accompanied by location information, translations and analyses, at Bill Thayer's Latin Inscriptions section of his LacusCurtius web site
Rendering Roman Capital Lettering: letterform structure & proportions and the number & order of strokes.
Adaptation of Capitalis Monumentalis letterforms by Coin Engravers
Although in general the inscriptional letterforms
employed by Roman coin die engravers, particularly
those of the early Empire, closely follow
CAPITALIS MONUMENTALIS
letterforms there are some subtle differences, mostly
resulting from the limited space available on coins for
inscriptional lettering. Most notably, they were
modified to produce closer spacing and a compaction of
the wide letters C O Q
and M resulting in more
uniform and "square" lettering. The essential
letterform constructs were closely followed for coins
of the early to mid Empire who's inscriptions are
generally stately and elegant: E and F
have equal length horizontal bars; A has a sharp apex; V has a sharp junction; the bowls of
B P R S are always
nicely formed -- P
sometimes being rendered with an open bowl, i.e. not
touching the vertical stem at the bottom. The quality
of Roman coin lettering reached its zenith on late
period Julio-Claudian coins.
It is hard to conjecture exactly how the letterforms were rendered on the coin dies. Having cut/inscribed Roman Capital letters myself in stone, wood/linoleum blocks and various metals I can imagine the die engravers would have used a selection of chisels (burins), stamps and punches -- the quality of the lettering may therefor have depended to some extent on the skill of the tool makers. The size of the planchet and the quality of the coin metal would also be determining factors. Certainly blundered letters did occur as evidenced by the S in CAES and the S in COS on the following almost mint state Quadrans of Claudius. Rendering well proportioned and constructed Capital Roman lettering has always demanded considerable skill and it seems there has always existed a disparity of skills among the crafstsmen who executed them -- regardless of the tools and media employed.
![[Julio-Claudian coin photo]](ric12rs.jpg)
CLAUDIUS, RIC Volume I, No. 88
Examples of early Roman Empire coin lettering
![[Julio-Claudian coin photo]](ric06os.jpg)
Examples of later Roman Empire coin lettering
There wasn't any sudden change in the quality of inscriptional letterforms although, as Dr. Sutherland notes (Roman Coins, page 224), by the reign of ELAGABALUS (218-222) the quality and style of coin inscriptional lettering had noticeably declined from that of the earlier Empire.
However, I think the inscriptional letterform quality is quite high on many of the early Lugdunum reformed folles as exemplified by the following "Unknown Continental Mint" Class I coins:
![[Roman coin inscription exemplar]](lug14ar1.jpg)
IMP C DIOCLETIANVS PF
AVG ............................
GENIO POPV -- LI
ROMANI
DIOCLETIAN
RIC Volume VI (Lugdunum) No.
14a
![[Roman coin inscription exemplar]](lug14br2.jpg)
IMP C MAXIMIANVS PF AVG
............................ GENIO POPV -- LI ROMANI
MAXIMIAN HERCULIUS
RIC Volume VI (Lugdunum) No.
14b
![[Roman coin inscription exemplar]](lug17ar1.jpg)
FL VAL CONSTANTIVS NOB C
............................ GENIO POPV -- LI ROMANI
CONSTANTIUS
RIC Volume VI (Lugdunum) No.
17a
There is some uneveness of letter height, but overall the lettering is quite pleasing and nicely rendered.
Examples of early British Tetrarchic coin lettering
By the time of the introduction of the British Tetrarchic coinage, the character of the inscriptional letterforms had changed significantly. They were noticeably smaller and thicker with heavier serifs. To my calligrapher's eye the early LON and unmarked folles inscriptions in particular often have poorly formed letters (however, as is the case with latter day calligraphers, not all coin die engravers were equally skilled). The graceful proportions and elegant structures of the early Empire letterforms are no longer evident. The bowls of B P R S, always difficult to execute with precision, are now often distorted or disproportional. O is often curiously small or distorted and out of round. X is given an entirely new form. The letter A (sometimes without the horizontal cross bar) now has a flat apex and V a flat bottom. T is often squat with very pronounced serifs.
![Roman lettering exemplar [Roman lettering exemplar]](cap01.jpg)
Depiction of A, M, X, V Roman coin
letterforms
The following coin of GALERIUS (RIC Volume VI, Londinium, No. 33) illustrates the typically somewhat thicker inscriptional lettering with heavier serifs so noticeable on the coins of this period.
![Tetrarch coin photo] [Tetrarch coin photo]](lon33r1.jpg)
MAXIMIANVS NOBIL C
......................... GENIO
POPV -- LI ROMANI
GALERIUS MAXIMIAN (RIC)
RIC Volume VI (Londinium) No. 33.
![[Roman coin inscription exemplar]](lonint1r.jpg)
C VAL MAXIMIANVS NOB C .......................
GENIO POPV -- LI ROMANI
GALERIUS
RIC Volume VI (Londinium)
Intermediate Group (a)
Intermediate Group (a) issue - Lugdunum style head and British style Lettering
The following exemplars illustrate the somewhat distorted forms of P R and O often encountered on Romano-British Tetrarchic folles (albeit some may result from uneven strikes).
The following exemplars illustrate in particular the flat top A, the flat bottom V, the strongly serifed T, the "new" form of X -- again often encountered on Romano-British Tetrarchic folles.
References and Resources
Anyone is granted permission to use content,
including images, on this page in accordance with the
terms of the appended Creative
Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States
License. Attribution: Used by permission of James
Pickering http://jp29.org/
Link to go to the Early British Tetrarchic Coinage Directory